Bitsum Community Forum

General Category => Process Lasso => Topic started by: jgor73 on May 23, 2011, 05:37:07 PM

Title: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: jgor73 on May 23, 2011, 05:37:07 PM
Tried to install the latest 5.0 beta on top of beta 4.09.57 and hit an error writing a temporary file.  Have screen copy of error.
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: Jeremy Collake on May 23, 2011, 11:28:35 PM
That is strange. Try rebooting your computer and make sure you do a full install of Process Lasso and aren't using the automated update.
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: jgor73 on May 24, 2011, 12:10:15 AM
Jeremy,

I did that and also uninstalled the previous version but still got "Error writing temp file. Make sure your temp folder is valid".
I was also able to reinstall Beta 4.09.57 after this.  (Win7 Pro, 64 bit system).
                                                  John 
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: Jeremy Collake on May 24, 2011, 12:40:23 AM
Are you out of disk space by any chance? Whatever the problem, it sounds like something wrong with your system.
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: jgor73 on May 24, 2011, 12:45:46 AM
No...Have plenty of disc space (450 Gigs left)...
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: Jeremy Collake on May 24, 2011, 12:48:15 AM
It could be your security, indexing, or backup software maybe causing access problems, though that's a stretch. Maybe file-system corruption. I don't know. Nothing has changed in the install process. I will keep an eye out for problems, but I haven't heard of anything like this before.
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: jgor73 on May 24, 2011, 02:53:03 AM
It appears that I encountered a System/Registry error over the last few days.  Was able to get v5.00.06 installed after a recent Acronis backup recovery action.  Sorry....My bad.....

   John 
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: Jeremy Collake on May 24, 2011, 03:01:31 AM
Its no problem, glad you got it resolved
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: TfH on May 24, 2011, 11:22:48 AM
Quote from: jgor73 on May 24, 2011, 12:10:15 AM"Error writing temp file. Make sure your temp folder is valid".

I had that error once, but forgot to mention it.

Scenario:
I was in my "standard" account and PL was running. I switched to "admin" account and PL was still running on "standard" (didn't log out). When in "admin" account PL said there si update and i thought"cool, i update". And then i received that error.

Solution:
Logged out from "standard" and continued doing my maintenace stuff in "admin" account.
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: Jeremy Collake on May 24, 2011, 07:17:07 PM
Are you speaking of the automatic updater or manual updater? I will test both in limited user environments and see what I can discover. The thing is that the upgrader or installer always run with elevated rights, and even without elevated rights the temp folder should be fully accessible.
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: TfH on May 24, 2011, 08:07:29 PM
That was automated installer what caused my problem.

When there is a new update, i try to reproduce it.


EDIT:

v4 series
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: Jeremy Collake on May 24, 2011, 09:11:42 PM
Ok, I will take a closer look, thanks ;)
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: TfH on May 25, 2011, 09:59:25 AM
I reproduced it:

4.09.56(beta)-->5.0.0.9(beta) 
There is problem on same scenario i poster earlier and same solution for this:
(http://dragonsfiles.com/40956_5009prob.png)


Other test i made on this same scenario.
5.0.0.6(beta)-->5.0.0.9(beta) no problem at all.

I can reproduce it on v4 series, but not in v5 series :)
Title: Re: Install fail with Process Lasso v5.0.0.6 beta
Post by: Jeremy Collake on July 16, 2011, 03:40:13 PM
Topic split into new one about the ZoneAlarm work-around ...