News:

NOTICE: This forum is mostly an archive, though new posts are allowed. Registration may require manual admin activation. After registering visit https://bitsum.com/contact/ to request account activation.

Main Menu

Linux scheduler / misc

Started by BenYeeHua, April 03, 2013, 07:19:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

BenYeeHua

Quote from: Support on April 03, 2013, 06:56:33 PM
More important is a host that can handle your load. If you need resources, you have to pay for them. Shared hosting providers love to suck people in with cheap prices, then tell them they are using too many resources, and must upgrade. Most all shared hosting is oversold, including VPSes. It took me a few tries to find a cloud hosting provider that I could depend on (RackSpace). You get what you pay for.

If you are low on money, Linux is always cheaper than Windows hosting, and it consumes fewer resources. No licensing cost with Linux.
Yes, for the server/computer that need more resources, like converting etc, it is better with linux.
Just like AMD show-off it's multi-threads power with linux.  ;)

Jeremy Collake

Quote from: BenYeeHua on April 03, 2013, 07:19:45 PM
Just like AMD show-off it's multi-threads power with linux.  ;)

Yep, because they can take their pick of CPU schedulers with Linux, and/or modify the scheduler's code. As opposed to waiting for Microsoft, and hoping their scheduler is behaves optimally.
Software Engineer. Bitsum LLC.

BenYeeHua

Quote from: Support on April 03, 2013, 07:24:46 PM
Yep, because they can take their pick of CPU schedulers with Linux, and/or modify the scheduler's code. As opposed to waiting for Microsoft, and hoping their scheduler is behaves optimally.
Let hope it will be optimize when Windows Blue come out. :)