I don't have a quick answer. I have not looked into that firmware. Support could be extended for that platform, there's no doubt about it. It wouldn't take much work, but the issue is that any change to the kit comes with a lot of extra testing and is generally painful. I don't have one of these devices to even test with myself. At this time I am relying on users to help contribute patches to the FMK. I've already added one new commiter/contributor to the project only last week, when he added support for a different firmware type. Anyone who wants to take the time to make the necessary adjustments, feel free.
It is unfortunate DD-WRT frowns upon the entire idea, as they don't like people changing their firmwares (yes, even though it is open source and 99% of it consist of the linux open source kernel). His scripts and web UI additions are apparently very valuable to their bottom line, so they prefer to try to keep control of them. That's another subject though. It just does seem to be a shame that a supposed free open source project is so difficult to tweak.
It would be trivial for them to provide something similar to the FMK, capable of taking their firmware images apart, allowing modification, then reconstructing them. Their precious web UI would still be protected, since the source code isn't distributed so you can't rebuild it. However, they have no interest in providing such.
Don't take it out on me, I'm just a volunteer who wasted a year of my life first hacking the WRT54Gv5 so it could run DD-WRT micro, and in other projects like the FMK. That was the poorest year of my life and I nearly destroyed myself financially as I tried to contribute to the F/OSS world. I still do contribute, but only when I can.
DD-WRT, on the other hands, *profits* from their work. It is not unreasonable for their users to demand such a tool from them. Heck, I think Brainslayer must have retired, as I sure haven't seen him around much, lol.
