Started by kuraigu, October 11, 2014, 05:22:31 AM
Quote from: arcanum on October 16, 2014, 12:27:49 PMMaybe JC can hardcode Outposts' kernel driver as a "safe"
Quote from: Jeremy Collake on October 16, 2014, 12:32:28 PMBut, we all understand that security software is more about scaring users than providing real protection.
Quote from: Jeremy Collake on October 16, 2014, 11:25:00 PMWhat I'm going to do is add those processes to the 'tamper-proof ignored processes' as well.And you bring up another bone of contention I have with the implementation of these tamper detection technologies on security software. They seem to have absolutely no concept of throttling their alerts. There is no need to repeatedly log the same detection event every second. Oh well.Of course, tamper *protection*, actually blocking abusive calls, is something that makes sense, but this tamper *detection* is alerting on entirely benign read-only access to the process(es).But, it's not a perfect world, so I'll continue working to improve interoperability with these tamper detection systems.
Quote from: XhenEd on October 17, 2014, 01:19:35 AMI actually support you on this one. Security softwares are just being paranoid.
Quote from: arcanum on October 17, 2014, 03:57:25 AMI always support so called "one man" programs. JC, if i were you, do release PL Gamer version and left PL for geeks. Might be good for sales? Im first one that gonna buy PL gamer version -arc