Bitsum Highest Performance Mode vs Ultimate Performance mode

[empleat]

Hello,
is there any difference between Bitsum Highest Performance Mode and Ultimate Performance mode. I prefer Ultimate Performance mode with disabled idle saver, because i heard microsoft made it to eliminate micro stutters. It feels there is less input lag than using High Performance mode with same setting. I know there are many more hidden power plan settings. I don't know all what they do. I tried unhide some and i had already set them to max. But anyway i wanted to ask, if there are some more hidden power plan settings. Or if i use Ultimate Performance mode with disabled idle saver, my cpu already works at maximum potential.

Thanks!

[edkiefer]

Hello,
is there any difference between Bitsum Highest Performance Mode and Ultimate Performance mode. I prefer Ultimate Performance mode with disabled idle saver, because i heard microsoft made it to eliminate micro stutters. It feels there is less input lag than using High Performance mode with same setting. I know there are many more hidden power plan settings. I don't know all what they do. I tried unhide some and i had already set them to max. But anyway i wanted to ask, if there are some more hidden power plan settings. Or if i use Ultimate Performance mode with disabled idle saver, my cpu already works at maximum potential.

Thanks!

Hi, No, that is more a marketing thing from MS. Last time I checked the Ultimate power plan, all it was was a default HP with sleep disabled for HD's. You can easily check yourself in the registry as what it adds to an HP overlay power plan.
Anyway, use the BHP as a base plan with whatever settings you want to add/alter for your specific conditions.

[Jeremy Collake]

Your have achieved the best you'll get with Bitsum Highest Performance, or Ultimate Performance.

'High Performance' normally has core parking and frequency scaling enabled. Bitsum Highest Performance disables those, as does Ultimate Performance Mode. BHP starts with a cloned copy of Ultimate Performance, so is going to be virtually identical. Aside from core parking and frequency scaling being disabled, there isn't any special magic in Ultimate Performance.

In creating Ultimate Performance, Microsoft essentially copied what we were already doing with Bitsum Highest Performance.

I don't recommend additional tweaks to your power plans.

[empleat]

I disagree, i tested it thorougly and using Ultimate Performance Plan with disabled idle saver and core parking and 100 min. cpu state and disabled usb power saving - mouse feels much more snappier, than using any other performance plans with same settings. E.g. if i switch to Ultimate Performance plan from High performance plan, mouse feels more snappier and responding more quickly to smallest movements. It it especially apparent on small movements, when i want mouse move about 3 pixels. It instantly moves. Whilst using other performance plan, it is more sluggish. Also i do a lot of mouseaccuracy.com tests, where you have to rapidly click dots. It makes huge difference there, you can see mouse responding much more quickly. There is input lag ab test on blurbusters forums, which can let you split screen at 2 halfs. One with more input lag and you can test yourself, how much of input lag you can discern. I was able to tell even 6ms of difference, i am very sensitive to these things. Isn't it possibile all settings aren't simply listed in registry, or Windows does something, when this power plan is active ?
 
That's the thing i don't know, if there any more hidden settings, that affect cpu performance and input lag. That's why i was asking. So if i have cpu min. state on 100 and disabled idle saver, and core parking, that's it right ?

EDIT: strange, Ultimate Performance power plan feels much better than Bitsum High performance plan set to same settings, all above mentioned. And i am not imagining it, i can tell 6 ms difference in input lag, tested myself see above.  And i was supreme master class in cs go and i am very sensitive to this!

[Unico]

Translated message.
See your post i have tried it too, and I agree with you, but the difference between the two settings is not in itself.
I found that the difference lies in the "difference of the parkcontrol cpu management", putting in both the same perkcontrol settings the result is identical, both for better and for worse.
Strangely the "high performance windows" management, even if less performing as calibration in the assay, have the best low "input-lag" and is more fluid and reactive.
I respectfully confirm.

[edkiefer]

I have double and tripled checked, there is nothing in ultimate power plan that can do anything..

All the settings are stored in the registry so that is where all settings are.

[Unico]

The input-lag is also subject to various factors of the hardware used, also in the context of the video card and the type of monitor, not having all a standardized machine, there are not the same results.
In the current question the problem is not so problematic, instead of using Bitsum Highgest Performance we use that of Windows.
Also to leave it always active, only when really power is required this is actually supplied, for me personally it is not a big problem.