- Welcome to Bitsum Community Forum.
Development (period)
Recent posts
#1
General / Unbelievable experiences with ...
Last post by Hemoni - Today at 12:22:29 AMPlaying uno online has given me an experience that I will never forget. From happy laughter at big wins to the tense moments when there's only one last card left. Each card is a story, and each card has its own power to reverse the situation.
When I started, I thought Uno was just a simple entertainment game. But then, through each game, I realized that Uno was also a game of tactics, of observation, and of psychology. I learned how to read the opponents, predict their next moves and figure out how to win.
On weekends, I often invite my friends to play Uno online. We shared our joys, our laughter, and our joyful jokes. Even if it's just images and sounds on a computer screen, the feeling of closeness—the connection between us—hasn't diminished.
Per se, the most exciting thing about playing Uno online is not knowing what happens next. Every time "Draw Four" is put down, you can't help but feel a little nervous, whether or not you have to pull more cards. And when you say "Uno" with the last card in your hand, the excitement increases.
With each game, I'm getting more and more in love with Uno. It's not just a game; it's part of life; it brings joy and connectivity to people, wherever they are in the world. And I know that, no matter how busy I am, I'll spend time enjoying Uno games online, laughing, playing, and living.
#2
General / [url=https://taxi-anapa-aeropo...
Last post by anapahScierb - Yesterday at 11:53:38 PMТакси Анапа аэропорт предлагает комфортный и экономичный способ добраться до вашего рейса. Заказывая такси заранее, вы можете избежать напряжения, связанного с поиском транспорта в последний момент. Многие компании предлагают фиксированные тарифы, что позволяет заранее знать стоимость поездки. Это особенно выгодно, если вы едете с большим багажом или детьми. Водители такси в Сочи хорошо ориентируются в городе и окрестностях, обеспечивая быстрое и безопасное прибытие в аэропорт.
#3
General / футболки с головой медведя
Last post by JamesLieta - Yesterday at 10:35:44 PMО производстве
Здесь вы можете вкратце ознакомиться с нашим подходом к производству и некоторыми его этапами.
https://vilmoda.ru/poisk/?q=красивые+мужские+С,,СѓС,болки+РєСѓРїРёС,СЊ
футболка слон купить
Материал
Футболки мы покупаем готовые на большой фабрике. Мы посчитали, что это лучше, чем собственный цех по той простой причине, что фабрика имеет несравнимо больший опыт и значит делает более качественно. Ткань - хлопок 100% высокого качества (кулирка, Пенье, гребенная пряжа), плотность 160 грамм.
Принт нарезается из пленки на плоттере. Это не печать. Пленка производства Кореи, Германии или Англии - в зависимости от цвета и наличия у поставщиков. Пленку производства других стран не используем.
Нанесение
Сама технология не сложная: берется лист термопленки, плоттер вырезает рисунок, человек удаляет лишние элементы, после под воздействием температуры (160 градусов) приклеивает принт к футболке.
Это не первое наше производство. Мы занимались сублимацией (синтетические ткани, полная запечатка, так называемые 3d-футболки) и прямой печатью (DTG) на натуральных тканей. Каждая технология имеет и плюсы, и минусы. В конечном итоге, мы остановились на озвученном выше способе, т.к. считаем его оптимальным за счет стойкости принта и натуральности ткани.
Сублимация хороша тем, что позволяет за относительно невысокую себестоимость делать вещи с полной запечаткой, но применима только к синтетическим тканям, которые выбирают далеко не все покупатели. А прямая печать имеет невысокий срок стойкости принта и требуется соблюдение ряда требований по уходу за футболкой. И, говоря про используемый нами метод, его минус лишь в отсутствии разноцветных принтов. В остальном сплошные плюсы: долговечность принта, доступная цена натуральная ткань. Принт не ощущается на теле, толщина 80 мкм, проверено на себе.
РєСѓРїРёС,СЊ С,,СѓС,болку мужскую СЃ РїСЂРёРЅС,РѕРј недорогие
Здесь вы можете вкратце ознакомиться с нашим подходом к производству и некоторыми его этапами.
https://vilmoda.ru/poisk/?q=красивые+мужские+С,,СѓС,болки+РєСѓРїРёС,СЊ
футболка слон купить
Материал
Футболки мы покупаем готовые на большой фабрике. Мы посчитали, что это лучше, чем собственный цех по той простой причине, что фабрика имеет несравнимо больший опыт и значит делает более качественно. Ткань - хлопок 100% высокого качества (кулирка, Пенье, гребенная пряжа), плотность 160 грамм.
Принт нарезается из пленки на плоттере. Это не печать. Пленка производства Кореи, Германии или Англии - в зависимости от цвета и наличия у поставщиков. Пленку производства других стран не используем.
Нанесение
Сама технология не сложная: берется лист термопленки, плоттер вырезает рисунок, человек удаляет лишние элементы, после под воздействием температуры (160 градусов) приклеивает принт к футболке.
Это не первое наше производство. Мы занимались сублимацией (синтетические ткани, полная запечатка, так называемые 3d-футболки) и прямой печатью (DTG) на натуральных тканей. Каждая технология имеет и плюсы, и минусы. В конечном итоге, мы остановились на озвученном выше способе, т.к. считаем его оптимальным за счет стойкости принта и натуральности ткани.
Сублимация хороша тем, что позволяет за относительно невысокую себестоимость делать вещи с полной запечаткой, но применима только к синтетическим тканям, которые выбирают далеко не все покупатели. А прямая печать имеет невысокий срок стойкости принта и требуется соблюдение ряда требований по уходу за футболкой. И, говоря про используемый нами метод, его минус лишь в отсутствии разноцветных принтов. В остальном сплошные плюсы: долговечность принта, доступная цена натуральная ткань. Принт не ощущается на теле, толщина 80 мкм, проверено на себе.
РєСѓРїРёС,СЊ С,,СѓС,болку мужскую СЃ РїСЂРёРЅС,РѕРј недорогие
#4
Process Lasso / Re: My E-cores makes me crazy
Last post by Jeremy Collake - Yesterday at 06:29:27 AMWe'd really have to dig into this to give you a certain answer. It is strange that you can't achieve close to the same results that you had when disabling E-cores at the BIOS level, but as you mentioned, Windows thread scheduling on these platforms is a mess.
What power plan (or mode) are you in? If not already, switch to a high performance plan to help dissuade Windows from making use of the E-cores. You can use ParkControl to check the heterogenous scheduling settings for the power plan.
What power plan (or mode) are you in? If not already, switch to a high performance plan to help dissuade Windows from making use of the E-cores. You can use ParkControl to check the heterogenous scheduling settings for the power plan.
#5
Process Lasso / Re: My E-cores makes me crazy
Last post by Manuel - May 18, 2024, 05:49:27 AMQuote from: Jeremy Collake on May 17, 2024, 03:00:07 PMWhat analysis software is this?
Thank you for your quick response!
My analysis software is "SCIA Engineer" and the process that does the calculations is "DesignForms_CalcExe.exe".
QuoteFirst, let's ensure you've checked menu item 'Options / Forced Mode (continuously reapply settings)', in case that software is managing its own affinity.
I tried after your indication, but it didn't seem to change things....
QuoteWith the E-cores removed by affinity, the total CPU % is going to be limited since only the P-cores can be used. In contrast, when you disabled the E-cores in the BIOS, the CPU consumption could reach 100% since the E-cores were not included in the total available capacity.
This aspect is clear, thank you!
QuoteYou should also check for any thread count setting in the analysis software and set it to the total number of P-cores threads you have available (2x the P-cores). Otherwise, it may launch too many threads for the constrained CPU affinity to cope with.
How is the analysis time after the rules you set with Process Lasso?
I was able to get only the P-Cores to work in various ways, see image below, but although the bar graph says that the P-Cores are working at maximum, HWiNFO64 indicates that the work rate is at about 45% (I think this value is correct, because the case fans do not start running at maximum as if I run Cinebench).
The strange thing, besides the fact that the P-Cores are not working at maximum, is that the processing time is always very long (the behavior is very different if I disable the E-Cores in the BIOS), it seems that Windows still wants to try to work with the E-Cores and this slows everything down (I don't know if this is really the case, but it is my impression).
Just for information, I tried to run the software on a Ryzen 7950x that does not have E-Cores, but again the processing time is incredibly too long compared to using (8+8) P-Cores from the 13900K (selected via BIOS)... and with a Ryzen I could not use the "trick" of disabling E-Cores from BIOS.
Do you have any other suggestions for me?
If not, I guess I'll have to give up....
Thanks in advance
Manuel
#6
Process Lasso / Re: My E-cores makes me crazy
Last post by Jeremy Collake - May 17, 2024, 03:00:07 PMWhat analysis software is this?
First, let's ensure you've checked menu item 'Options / Forced Mode (continuously reapply settings)', in case that software is managing its own affinity.
With the E-cores removed by affinity, the total CPU % is going to be limited since only the P-cores can be used. In contrast, when you disabled the E-cores in the BIOS, the CPU consumption could reach 100% since the E-cores were not included in the total available capacity.
You should also check for any thread count setting in the analysis software and set it to the total number of P-cores threads you have available (2x the P-cores). Otherwise, it may launch too many threads for the constrained CPU affinity to cope with.
How is the analysis time after the rules you set with Process Lasso?
First, let's ensure you've checked menu item 'Options / Forced Mode (continuously reapply settings)', in case that software is managing its own affinity.
With the E-cores removed by affinity, the total CPU % is going to be limited since only the P-cores can be used. In contrast, when you disabled the E-cores in the BIOS, the CPU consumption could reach 100% since the E-cores were not included in the total available capacity.
You should also check for any thread count setting in the analysis software and set it to the total number of P-cores threads you have available (2x the P-cores). Otherwise, it may launch too many threads for the constrained CPU affinity to cope with.
How is the analysis time after the rules you set with Process Lasso?
#7
Process Lasso / My E-cores makes me crazy
Last post by Manuel - May 17, 2024, 12:12:12 PMDear all,
I use a workstation with i9-13900K processor and the 16 E-core gives me a lot of problems. The problem is well known, Windows 11 has problems handling some applications in the background or hidden and as a result some software loses a lot of performance.
I use the workstation for work with analysis software and, to give an example, if I launch a calculation with all 32 threads available on a model I use as a reference, the calculation takes about 9 minutes. If I disable the E-cores via BIOS, all the P-cores work at 100% and the time decreases to about 1 minute 30"! I don't know what Windows does, but it's a mess!!!
The current solution is to disable the E-core via BIOS, but it is something that irritates me, because 16 cores are off and in other tests, such as Cinebench R23, they all work smoothly and with very good performance (I calculated that the 16 E-core contribute about 40% of the performance).
I have a Process Lasso license with which I hoped to solve the problem, but I have tried everything and the results are always the same. The process performing the calculations starts for a few seconds using 100% of the 13900K's 32 threads and then "sits" at about 35% making everything work a little bit, but badly... (below is a screenshot of an example analysis).
I tried in various combinations what you see below, but nothing ever changed:
- Exclude from probalance
- affinity - only P-core
- efficiency mode off
- I/O priority high
- windows dynamic thread priority boost off
- induce performance mode on
Do you have any suggestions?
I am going crazy!
Thanks in advance
Manuel
I use a workstation with i9-13900K processor and the 16 E-core gives me a lot of problems. The problem is well known, Windows 11 has problems handling some applications in the background or hidden and as a result some software loses a lot of performance.
I use the workstation for work with analysis software and, to give an example, if I launch a calculation with all 32 threads available on a model I use as a reference, the calculation takes about 9 minutes. If I disable the E-cores via BIOS, all the P-cores work at 100% and the time decreases to about 1 minute 30"! I don't know what Windows does, but it's a mess!!!
The current solution is to disable the E-core via BIOS, but it is something that irritates me, because 16 cores are off and in other tests, such as Cinebench R23, they all work smoothly and with very good performance (I calculated that the 16 E-core contribute about 40% of the performance).
I have a Process Lasso license with which I hoped to solve the problem, but I have tried everything and the results are always the same. The process performing the calculations starts for a few seconds using 100% of the 13900K's 32 threads and then "sits" at about 35% making everything work a little bit, but badly... (below is a screenshot of an example analysis).
I tried in various combinations what you see below, but nothing ever changed:
- Exclude from probalance
- affinity - only P-core
- efficiency mode off
- I/O priority high
- windows dynamic thread priority boost off
- induce performance mode on
Do you have any suggestions?
I am going crazy!
Thanks in advance
Manuel
#8
General / Re: Difference between termina...
Last post by Jeremy Collake - May 17, 2024, 06:49:18 AMClosing first sends a message signaling the process to end, allowing it a chance to gracefully close. Termination forcibly ends the process.
#9
General / Difference between terminating...
Last post by riley - May 16, 2024, 07:10:15 PMDifference between terminating and closing process?
#10
Process Lasso / Re: core engine is not running...
Last post by DaymanSalvort - May 15, 2024, 06:22:20 AMI am in fact grateful to this site which has shared this fantastic information here.