NOTICE: This forum is mostly an archive, though new posts are allowed. Registration may require manual admin activation. After registering visit https://bitsum.com/contact/ to request account activation.
Started by chris635, March 04, 2015, 08:25:05 PM
Quote from: chris635 on March 22, 2015, 11:19:14 AMLook at the working set for your process's, are any over 196mb (are any over 50mb)? Jeremy set that as default last night.
Quote from: chris635 on March 22, 2015, 01:28:37 PMThat is curious as it should have seen 1gb working set. Doesn't palemoon share firefox profile? If so I wonder if that has something to do with it?
Quote from: edkiefer on March 22, 2015, 01:40:53 PMLets see what Jeremy says, I don't want to keep clogging thread with same issues as were going around in circles now on my end .
Quote from: Jeremy Collake on March 22, 2015, 05:24:06 PMI just glimpsed through this as I prepare localization issues and PR stuff for 8.0 ... If there are issues with the code, I'll fix them in 8.0.1, as necessary - but I don't believe there are any critical problems. SmartTrim should work as advertised.FWIW, I believe the issue is the new defaults, good call chris. Many users will be disappointed to see SmartTrim do nothing, but that's the best thing it could do most of the time. As I innovate, I'll have it do more in more scenarios, but never just so we can say it did something. If Smart is in the name, might as well endeavor to be just that .
Quote from: chris635 on March 22, 2015, 06:03:59 PMYes, I agree Ed. I rarely get over 25% unless gaming or performing something very intensive. I do like the idea of trimming individual process though (firefox and outlook to name a few).
Quote from: Jeremy Collake on March 22, 2015, 06:32:22 PMDefinitely it's a conservative algorithm to start with. If you set the min RAM load too low, it'll almost never find an eligible process because hardly any RAM is being used by running applications. Even when you use 'Trim Now'. This is something that may change, in time.. I mean, if users really want to trim everything, then certainly I'll add a 'full trim' or something.I continue to check for any problems. I'm too experienced to dare think I don't make mistakes, but am prepared to quickly deal with anything that comes up.
Quote from: Jeremy Collake on March 22, 2015, 06:58:55 PMYea, and you may not be the only one. That may be 8.0.1's next change.
Quote from: edkiefer on March 23, 2015, 11:19:52 PMsmall update, I added bf4.exe to smarttrim exclude list but it still got trimmed while I was gaming .Don't know if this is new as first time i tried .
Quote from: Jeremy Collake on March 24, 2015, 12:00:51 PM<table><tr><td>188.8.131.52</td><td>Fix</td><td>Core</td><td>Fix a case where a trim could occur on a process marked as both a game and exclusion, under the right conditions</td></tr></table>Vague, but it's hard to explain this in detail. There is so much to the entirety of the logic that makes all this work. Basically, a secondary check that would *never* be reached had you not unchecked 'allow trim while gaming mode' was inverted. That secondary check was actually redundant, so is now removed.
Quote from: edkiefer on March 24, 2015, 12:18:02 PMLast time I tested "allow smarttrim to trim when game mode is engaged" it works the opposite , no trim when checked .On path of exe, you can only add exe name, there is no path, search to process now .I'll test next beta .
Quote from: Jeremy Collake on March 24, 2015, 12:48:26 PMAmended this page a bit to describe the type of highly incremental and frequent release development strategy that Bitsum uses. That was the original intent of that post, way back when, but I got distracted at the time (apparently) and ended up at the basic description of our VCS.
Quote from: Jeremy Collake on March 24, 2015, 12:59:37 PMBad link, I think. Try now
Quote from: Jeremy Collake on March 24, 2015, 01:04:17 PMBut if I ever do hack WordPress and amend their login page, that would also be pretty cool ;p.
Quote from: Jeremy Collake on March 24, 2015, 12:28:25 PMI know you can only add the process basename, but that is inherently part of the full path. Thus, it didn't matter - but I wanted to mention it. It is something I'll clarify going forward.I'm still getting into gear here guys. Building silent 184.108.40.206 now, which should do better. Like I said, at the end of the week, I'll push a minor update with the latest fixes and language updates.This is how we do things here at Bitsum. Never wait for perfection (though of course make sure things work), but always keep the ball rolling. It works pretty well.Read more about how we do our versioning here: https://bitsum.wordpress.com/2015/01/16/how-bitsum-does-our-version-control/
Quote from: edkiefer on March 24, 2015, 01:18:50 PMRight , I know you would know I just wanted to give most info so you know what my setting was and what I entered in the field "bf4.exe" .sounds good .
Quote from: BenYeeHua on March 24, 2015, 02:50:01 PMONLY IN BATTLEFIELDDUN DUN DUN DUN DUN DUN!
Quote from: Jeremy Collake on March 24, 2015, 04:04:15 PMBuild refresh 220.127.116.11 makes an adjustment that should resolve the 'Allow SmartTrim if Gaming Mode engaged' issue. It should upload in about 30 minutes.
Quote from: Jeremy Collake on March 24, 2015, 04:13:35 PMThanks. I'll be checking it again myself, so am reasonably confident it's right, but God knows every developer needs QA support